“Gospels”可以造什么句，Gospels造句

The references to Yeshu are extremely negative and contradict the Gospels in quite a few places.

Another area of controversy focuses on apparent contradictions among the Gospels.

This truth is so important that it is repeated five times in the Gospels.

The New Testament Gospels disagree on the details but leave no doubt that Judas came to a bad end.

But she did try to please him; in the evening she read the Gospels, as he had asked her to.

There are several sayings in Thomas, unlike the sayings in the Gospels and the Canon, that are not eschatological, they very much point to the present.

So from the very beginning of the Gospel of John, you should know you're in a different world from the synoptic Gospels: Matthew, Mark, and Luke.

Notice the Gospel of John has other differences ; that I haven't even mentioned; for example,remember in the Synoptic Gospels there are lots of exorcisms of demons.

Secondly, the the word Kingdom. When I think of Kingdom I think of the Kingdom of God or the Kingdom of Heaven referred to many times throughout the Gospels.

"It's not my opinion: I'm saying that if you believe in the Gospels, you believe in the existence of the devil, in the devil's power to possess people," he said in an interview.

The names in the Gospels were added by later scribes.

Next to it stands another French work, the Four Gospels, produced later in the same century.

In ancient times, some of these alternative versions may have circulated more widely than the familiar four Gospels.

If you look at all the events the Gospels record - between the Last Supper and the Crucifixion - there is a large number.

It has never been the historical Jesus who has served as the motivating force for anything, except during his lifetime, but rather the Jesus who is inscribed in these Gospels.

If all you had were the first three Gospels, the ideas you would have was that Jesus' entire ministry took place basically in Galilee until the last part of his life.

Remember, Jesus is portrayed in some of the Gospels as himself having predicted that the temple would be destroyed.

That one sounds very, very much like what you've got already in the canonical Gospels so it should sound familiar to you.

After more than a century of immense effort, surprisingly little has been settled concerning the Gospels.

I think that's historical it goes against the tendency of the Gospels to portray Jesus as non-violent and non-confrontational in that last week I think he therefore did it. What did it mean?

On top of this, Jefferson was highly skeptical of the accounts of Jesus written in the Gospels.